Lies and More Lies......

 

So, he has taken the biz page down.... LIES

He has closed the paypal etc. Again more lies.....

Tick Tock.... 5 pm will come faster than one realizes......

I will also need proof these things are CLOSED not just turned off because he has a history of just taking them down (turning off) only to turn them right back on!!!!

Done playing games with him, so done.

It's his choice now. Will he comply with the cease and desist or will his entire shadow board have the sheriff and likely other alphabet agencies crawling up their asses???

I have other things to get done today than sit around listening to people he has lied to, claiming he shut things down when he hasn't.

~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~

It's all good though....

Blaze doesn't care about anyone except himself. He is hellbent to take his entire board down with him, so be it.

Blaze has no idea does he? I mean does he seriously think I am lying about the criminal complaint or the evidence we have backing it up???? 

I guess Jennifer, Nancy, Paula and Mike can all share a cell with him. What then? Gonna say I tried to warn you? Too late then...

So over his childish games. Grow up!

Jennifer, Nancy, Paula and Mike do NOT deserve to go down with him. Blaze has been manipulating them for years. I seriously do not think they grasp just how manipulated they are, but he is determined to take them right down with him for sure!!!!

Look up California Code on embezzlement - felony level and fraud felony level....

California Penal Code (CPC) §503 – Embezzlement –Embezzlement occurs in California when a person commits a fraud in order to take property that has been entrusted to him or her.

Embezzlement is actually charged as either Grand or Petty Theft. Felony Embezzlement, a form of Grand Theft, may be punished in California with three years in prison, a fine of up to $10,000, and/or jail time, depending on the facts of the case.

Section 5223 - Removal in case of fraudulent or dishonest acts, gross abuse of authority or discretion, or breach of duty

(a) The superior court of the proper county may, at the suit of a director, or twice the authorized number (Section 5036) of members or 20 members, whichever is less, remove from office any director in case of fraudulent or dishonest acts or gross abuse of authority or discretion with reference to the corporation or breach of any duty arising under Article 3 (commencing with Section 5230) of this chapter, and may bar from reelection any director so removed for a period prescribed by the court. The corporation shall be made a party to such action.

(b) The Attorney General may bring an action under subdivision (a), may intervene in such an action brought by any other party and shall be given notice of any such action brought by any other party.

Ca. Corp. Code § 5223

Section 532d - Unlawful solicitation or receipt of money or property for charitable, religious, or eleemosynary purpose (a) Any person who solicits or attempts to solicit or receives money or property of any kind for a charitable, religious or eleemosynary purpose and who, directly or indirectly, makes, utters, or ...

Do your own research! Blaze committed both fraud and embezzlement - look it up!!!! The new board had legal grounds to remove him on MULTIPLE levels!!!!!

But Blaze does not want to go down alone, that's for sure. He manipulated his old board (current shadow board) into thinking what he was doing was right and legal. Blaze discouraged them from doing research on the matter, wanting them to believe only what he told them. 

Now, they will be named on the criminal complaint right beside him.

Morning Thoughts and Coffee......

 

I receive so many calls, texts, messages etc, from people who feel in the middle of this issue with Blaze. They feel they must choose which of us to be friends with, and they really don't have to choose. I am sorry they feel that way.

I know people still want to believe Blaze's heart is truly in rescue. Blaze does talk about it all the time trying his best to convince people it is all he lives for. 

If his heart was in the right place would Blaze subject those poor dogs to crates so small sometimes for days at a time without being out of them? No, it did NOT just happen at Joshua Tree...... The multiple animal control reports I have document back to 2014 of Blaze forcing the animals into those conditions. So, if he truly was in it for the animals then why would he torture them like that???

Since this whole fiasco began in October 2023 I have not heard ONCE a single care for the animals still under our care - the ones Blaze abandoned. I bet the only ones he can even remember names for are Sal & Issa..... Where is the concern for them? Why haven't we heard a peep about how these animals need help to get spayed, neutered and networked to find homes???

Nope. It has been all about "poor pitiful" Blaze and what he is going through. It is never about what he put the animals through.... Nope..... Not one post of his has mentioned the 12 cats....... Not one post has been to help them get spayed, neutered and adopted..... Nope.... It is all about Blaze.

Sadly, this is what Blaze feels rescue is about.

For those us of picking up the pieces it IS and always has been about the animals. It is us financially supporting them. It is us doing the daily care for them. It is us trying to quietly network behind the scenes to find them homes, foster or adopt. We cannot openly do it because BLAZE reports the posts and fundraisers instead of supporting the effort to care for animals he abandoned. 

IF he truly cared about the animals he would NOT interfere with efforts to care for the ones he abandoned in October 2023. But he constantly does. Blaze cannot stand he is not in control of those animals anymore but mostly he cannot stand that he is not in control of the FUNDRAISING - because that is where he interferes the most. 

Blaze reports any efforts we make to fundraise to get the cats spayed & neutered - cats he could not care less about, cats he abandoned in October 2023......

If Blaze truly cared about animals then why the hell can he NOT care about the ones he walked away from TWICE in less than 6 months????

Why can he not care enough to allow us to do right by those animals? They deserve to find good homes instead of being shuffled from one foster to the next while awaiting their spay / neuter surgery.

Nope. Blaze cannot do this because it has never been about the animals for him. It is about him having sole control over everything, mostly the money.......

Let me give you a great example! When the 4 female rescue cats arrived I had no good place to house them except setting up the habitat inside of my large chicken coop. Now, this was a temporary situation since that part of the roof could NOT be properly waterproofed. Although I did make sure the habitats were covered well we had a storm coming in.

Blaze got pissed because I sent the 4 rescue girls to a foster who had a full bedroom available for them, instead of being in a leaky chicken coop. Blaze did not like the person who offered this care so he would rather the cats be subjected to a leaky roof than give them warmth and proper shelter.

Blaze allows his personal issues to interfere with his care of animals. Blaze allowed his personal relationships to nearly destroy the rescue itself. 

If Blaze truly cared for the animals he would have been happy the female cats had proper shelter. Instead, he threw a fit about it because he did not like the person who fostered them. 

I made sure those cats had proper food, shelter and care. I made sure the ones in the chicken coop got housed BEFORE the winter storms moved in. Blaze couldn't even bring himself to help me assemble those habitats...... 

Now the habitats are in the camper he was staying in and the rescue kitties are NOT housed in them..... Not the ones Blaze abandoned....... That camper is being repaired and set up as a cat house, for lack of better words lol. This way no kitty needs to be in a cage :)

So, is Blaze in it for the animals or the glory he gets for pretending to rescue. Again, I would remind folks that Blaze would have NEVER received a single award had those places been aware of the conditions the animals were forced to exist in.......

I do not seek glory or recognition. I want these amazing animals to find the homes they deserve. For me it is that simple. But, Blaze has to interfere every step of the way so does he truly care about the animals or himself????

Blaze tasked the board with saving the rescue. I have not erred in that duty. Now that we are near a formal reopening, Blaze wants to try to interfere more. 

So, is Blaze really in it for the animals????? Or is it that Blaze cannot see the rescue succeed without him???

I am sick of hearing the poor Blaze bullshit. People cannot seem to remember this entire situation is one Blaze created and could easily end if he simply stopped his bullshit. 

Now, I am to the point I want to see a PUBLIC post of him admitting his part in what happened. I want to see him admit to his lies. I want to see him admit he chose not to go back in October 2023 and forced the board to deal with a mess he made.

It is time he openly, publicly and honestly makes a post that acknowledges he created this entire fiasco and he is the one keeping it going with his lies and pity party. Blaze needs to admit he has cared nothing for the animals still under the rescue's care since October 2023 and he needs to admit how he has interfered with fundraising for them.

Unfortunately, this is not in his nature and I feel he will push tomorrow's deadline..... That email draft is ready, names, addresses everything. Screenshots too which show his old board having knowledge of misuse of funds...... 

How could Blaze care about the animals when he doesn't even care about his so-called board members??? He has involved them in fraud, embezzlement and more..... Those are FELONIES. Blaze doesn't care he will take them down with him, as long as Blaze gets the pity he feels he deserves!!!

Is he caring about Jennifer? Nancy? Paula? Mike? While he continues his bullshit? No, this is and always has been about Blaze and what Blaze wants. It has NEVER been about the animals and when the criminal investigation gets his records from his little shadow boards - YES even though you do them via voice they are recorded!!! I would lay money not one conversation has been about the welfare of animals or the animals Blaze abandoned and keeps interfering with their care!!! Nope, those conversations are all about poor, poor, victim Blaze and what everyone is doing to him --- never about what he has done to cause any of it.

So while the legal board continues to care for multiple animals Blaze abandoned, he shit talks us and refuses to comply with the 2 cease and desist letters he was formally issued. 

Blaze has not once had his little shadow board offer to provide food or supplies for the animals he abandoned. NOT ONCE. Does that sound like someone who cares about the animals???

On the other hand, I get SSI a whopping $1,100 or so a month and I do not hesitate to use the pittance I get to make sure those animals have what they need. Unfortunately, I cannot feed them and afford the needed spay / neuter surgeries...... Not on my income :(  But they are well cared for, being trained and ready for the amazing homes they deserve!!!!

At this point with his history with animal control and the pending criminal investigation, Blaze legally cannot be a part of a nonprofit animal rescue and because of the embezzlement he would never be able to be on a board again that has any control over funds. 

Blaze is going to keep pushing the legal board until we make sure he would never be able to be involved in animal rescue again, not even as a volunteer for one!!!!!!!!

If Blaze truly cares about the animals and his shadow board, he has a little more than 24 hours to make that public post and comply with the cease and desist. 

I am done playing his games. I am done with people trying to guilt me into feeling sorry for him. I do not feel sorry for him for a situation he created and refuses to accept responsibility for!!!!

It is his choice now whether to do the right thing or continue being selfish.......

Coffee Time Updates -- Blaze Caught in More Fraud

 

Once again I wanted to do a different kind of post, once again the narcissist Blaze has made it all about him.

There is a program that permits 501c3 rescues to purchase pallets of pet things, food, supplies etc. Each month it is random, never know until the email comes.

So, finally this month we received the email but learned Blaze had been receiving these pallets in the HHBR name for months now! He had even paid for this month's pallet!

Once again we had to submit tons of the documentation, a copy of the police report and prove that Blaze has no right to be doing what he did on this matter. His payment is being refunded and he is being banned for life from this program!

Praise the Lord we will finally be able to get this benefit for the rescue instead of Blaze wrongfully getting it for personal gain!!!

This program will also be providing us the documentation so that it may be added to the criminal report. What Blaze did with this program was fraud and where did all the items from those pallets go???

Those items rightfully belong to the rescue not to Blaze, yet he got them and used them for personal gain!!!!

Add one more place Blaze is banned for life. This is ridiculous though that he goes to such lengths to exploit programs set up for legitimate rescues and claims he is still with HHBRF in order to wrongfully benefit from these programs and then blasts the legal board saying it is us who is financially benefitting..... 

Blaze only cares about Blaze he does NOT care about the animals and his actions are proving that each and every day!!!!

Blaze wrongfully took benefits that could have been used for the animals he abandoned in Joshua Tree in October that are still under the rescue's care - why? Because Blaze doesn't care about the animals he only cares about himself!!!!!!!!!

Thankfully, this is one benefit he will no longer have access to!

The board also revamped all the contracts... OMFG how Blaze had them worded meant the rescue would retain ownership even on an adopted animal!!!! I see why JJ went ballistic over the 12 page adoption contract!!!! It isn't 12 pages anymore!!!

Now I have to pull boxes of previous contracts to add to the criminal report because of "deposits" Blaze had accepted and used wrongfully. Blaze seems to think he rightfully used the funds but he never once consulted California Code on the matter.... He left the board with no other choice but to file a criminal report......Which now totals near $10,000 in wrongfully used funds and the items from the pallets..... Not to mention rescue property he removed when he left my property.....

So, is he gonna grow the fuck up and stop being childish or do I have to continue to add to the criminal report - which each addition is a new charge on him........

Is Blaze that selfish that he simply cannot see that what he is doing is criminal and will put him in jail for years???

Is his shadow board so blind that they do not realize they will be held accountable for allowing him to do these things????

I have NOT yet added the names of his shadow board on the criminal complaint..... But, if the daily interference doesn't stop those names WILL be added. 

So, Jennifer, Nancy, Paula and others need to grasp the situation. The shadow board CAN AND WILL be held accountable for their knowledge of Blaze's misuse of funds and fraud they have permitted him to commit. 

If you do not believe me simply do some research on criminal code on the matter. I am TRYING to save the rescue without putting anyone in jail!!!!!

Blaze and his shadow board are making that very difficult!!! So, it is his choice now. Stop the bullshit. Back off or the entire shadow board is added to the criminal complaint for holding votes that permitted Blaze to misuse funds and commit fraud.

I am done playing his selfish, narcissistic games. I am here for the animals and helping the animals NOT to cover Blaze's ass at all costs. 

I want the fb page archived and a public post put up. This should be done by Friday no later than 5 pm pst. I want all rescue property in Blaze's possession arranged to be returned to the rescue. Blaze may not come on my property but we have people who can pick up and deliver it. 

I want all incidents of him using the HHBR name, emails etc closed and cancelled. This is basically what the cease and desist letters stated, the ones he continues to ignore. 

Blaze you have until 5 pm Friday to do these things or an email goes to the detective with full details and names of the shadow board, thus involving them in the criminal complaint. 

I am done playing his games. 

Also, if anyone has info on Blaze they wish to include in the criminal complaint you can submit it to contact@hhbrescue.com case # 082400136 you can remain anonymous.

This complaint was filed with the San Bernadino County Sheriff who may accept info directly to them, but you can also submit it to the email above with the case # attached and it will be given to the sheriff.

Thanks to all who send info and to those who already have!!!

So, Blaze you have a decision to make. Stop the nonsense or include your entire shadow board in the criminal charges. You have until Friday at 5 pm pst.......

On Friday @ 6 pm pst if this is not done an email is already drafted with all of the shadow board names and screenshots and will be sent to the detective.

Morning Coffee Ponderings.... What scare tactics???

 

So, another day and another post..... I know I said yesterday would be the last one, but there is one last thing to cover......

Multiple people have come to me to say Blaze is going to back off, saying he's done..... His actions do NOT demonstrate that though. 

Like usual he will probably blame the wrong person, like he did on who told me about his threats of trespassing to steal "his" dogs back. Blaze loves to lay blame where it does not belong...... Blaze gets off emotionally harming innocent people. It is what he has done for years and I do not see that changing anytime soon!!!

BTW Blaze you and DL both owe someone an apology over that.... Wrongfully blaming her when she was NOT the one who informed of that...... Several people have warned me of your intentions of trespassing to take dogs that do not lawfully belong to you. The next time you wanna jump the gun and blame someone MAYBE make sure you are accusing the right person, because the one you went off on had nothing to do with it. What you two did to her was disgusting and wrong considering she had nothing to do with informing me of his threat. Why DL is supporting his threat of committing a crime (trespassing and stealing dogs) is beyond me.... She never used to be like that........

Someone mentioned "scare tactics".... Sorry, not using those either. I am laying out truth and law (not my law - state law)..... If that scares someone it should!

Let me begin first with a snippet concerning the misuse of funds by the old board.....

~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*

Protection Act of 1997

In addition to the above general fiduciary responsibilities, the Board is also subject to special laws that govern their actions. The Volunteer Protection Act of 1997 (VPA) covers all 501(c)(3) organizations and their volunteers (including uncompensated directors) from liability, unless there is willful or criminal misconduct, gross negligence, or reckless conduct. Where reckless conduct has been described as an intentional act done with reckless disregard of the natural and probable consequence of injury to a known person under the circumstances or, alternatively, as an omission or failure to act when the actor has actual knowledge of the natural and probable consequence of injury and his opportunity to avoid the risk. Notably, the “reckless” standard is the same as in most states’ Nonprofit Corporations Acts.

Even though the Act provides some protection for the nonprofit organizations and their volunteers, it does require Directors to make sure their organization stays compliant with IRS guidelines and maintains its tax-exempt status.…one of the most common pitfalls for nonprofits is failure to file a Form 990 in a timely manner.

Easily done, right?  Yet one of the most common pitfalls for nonprofits is failure to file a Form 990 in a timely manner. That misstep, if occurring for three consecutive years, leads to auto-revocation of a nonprofit organization’s tax-exempt status – and potential loss of protection under the Volunteer Protection Act. Any number of other acts or omission can constitute recklessness as well.

~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*

Let me follow this with California Code concerning ADOPTION DEPOSITS

https://casetext.com/statute/california-codes/california-food-and-agricultural-code/division-14-regulation-and-licensing-of-dogs/chapter-1-general-provisions/section-30503-sale-or-gift-of-dog-that-has-not-been-spayed-or-neutered-prohibited

Section 30503 - Sale or gift of dog that has not been spayed or neutered prohibited

(a)

(1) Except as otherwise provided in subdivision (b), no public animal control agency or shelter, society for the prevention of cruelty to animals shelter, humane society shelter, or rescue group shall sell or give away to a new owner any dog that has not been spayed or neutered.

(2) For the purposes of this section a "rescue group" is a for-profit or not-for-profit entity, or a collaboration of individuals with at least one of its purposes being the sale or placement of dogs that have been removed from a public animal control agency or shelter, society for the prevention of cruelty to animals shelter, or humane shelter or that have been previously owned by any person other than the original breeder of that dog.

(b)

(1) If a veterinarian licensed to practice veterinary medicine in this state certifies that a dog is too sick or injured to be spayed or neutered, or that it would otherwise be detrimental to the health of the dog to be spayed or neutered, the adopter or purchaser shall pay the public animal control agency or shelter, society for the prevention of cruelty to animals shelter, humane society shelter, or rescue group a deposit of not less than forty dollars ($40), and not more than seventy-five dollars ($75).

(2) The entity shall establish the amount of the deposit at the level it determines is necessary to encourage the spaying or neutering of dogs.

(3) The deposit shall be temporary, and shall only be retained until the dog is healthy enough to be spayed or neutered, as certified by a veterinarian licensed to practice veterinary medicine in this state.

(4) The dog shall be spayed or neutered within 14 business days of that certification.

(5) The adopter or purchaser shall obtain written proof of spaying or neutering from the veterinarian performing the operation.

(6) If the adopter or purchaser presents proof of spaying or neutering to the entity from which the dog was obtained within 30 business days of obtaining the proof, the adopter or purchaser shall receive a full refund of the deposit.

(c) Public animal control agencies or shelters, society for the prevention of cruelty to animals shelters, humane society shelters, and rescue groups may enter into cooperative agreements with each other and with veterinarians in lieu of requiring spaying and neutering deposits to carry out this section.

(d) Any funds from unclaimed deposits made pursuant to this section, as it read on January 1, 1999, and any funds from deposits that are unclaimed after January 1, 2000, may be expended only for programs to spay or neuter dogs and cats, including agreements with a society for the prevention of cruelty to animals or a humane society or licensed veterinarian to operate a program to spay or neuter dogs and cats.

(e) This section only applies to a county that has a population exceeding 100,000 persons as of January 1, 2000, and to cities within that county.

Ca. Food and Agric. Code § 30503

Amended by Stats 2004 ch 253 (SB 1301),s 1, eff. 1/1/2005

Repealed by Stats 2004 ch 253 (SB 1301),s 2, eff. 1/1/2005.

~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*

NOTE THIS SECTION:

(d) Any funds from unclaimed deposits made pursuant to this section, as it read on January 1, 1999, and any funds from deposits that are unclaimed after January 1, 2000, may be expended only for programs to spay or neuter dogs and cats, including agreements with a society for the prevention of cruelty to animals or a humane society or licensed veterinarian to operate a program to spay or neuter dogs and cats.

~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*

So, Blaze was charging a $350 ADOPTION DEPOSIT not an adoption FEE there is a difference. The contracts he had clearly stated adoption deposit..... Blaze himself claims he created those adoption contracts......... Blaze himself locked that $350 into a program that could ONLY be used for spaying and neutering other animals. ANY OTHER USE OF THOSE FUNDS WAS ILLEGAL. 

Not only that, this code also clearly states exactly how much an ADOPTION DEPOSIT can be. Blaze was also clearly outside of the legal allowed limits on how much those deposits could be.

But Jeff, the tax LAWYER, was the asshole who didn't know shit right? Blaze knew everything right?

Obviously, Blaze doesn't know shit about California Code on how rescue's must operate, otherwise he would NEVER put the board in a position where every board member could face criminal charges of fraud and embezzlement!!!

** Something just hit me..... Blaze began turning on me when he put me on the board and he thought I would take his word as gospel, but I refused. I began ordering books and doing research.... Blaze did NOT want me to do those things..... WHY NOT? Look what I have learned so far...... Why did he NOT want me sharing the books or research with the board????? Because he KNEW he was doing wrong and the only way he could keep doing it was to keep the board members in the dark about it!

So, Blaze can claim the funds were used for rescue business..... not by law they weren't! As stated above an adoption deposit can ONLY be used to spay and neuter other animals.....

Since Blaze took in thousands of dollars in adoption deposits - where is that money??? 

Spending it on anything else IS embezzlement and fraud......

So, sorry to those who called what I am exposing a scare tactic..... As you can see it is NOT simply a scare tactic. The old board broke the law and did so because Blaze has them all convinced it was ok to do so!!!

This is why I asked if everyone on the old board is ready to go to jail with him and for him. Blaze cries no one will fight for him. blaze did NOT task me to fight for HIM he tasked me with saving the rescue!!!!!

Blaze thought saving the rescue meant it could be business as usual. But it can't!!!!

Is Jennifer, Nancy, Paula, Mike and others who served on the old board ready to do time for Blaze?

The only way they can save themselves now is to testify against him. That ball is already rolling.... Criminal complain for embezzlement is already filed....... It is for the old board to choose now how they stand. 

Ignorance of the law is no excuse..... Ask any cop that question!

So, if some think it is a scare tactic - maybe those who do have something to hide......

As for him saying he is done and will back off, I have yet to see ANY steps in that direction.

If he was going to back off then he would comply with BOTH Cease and Desist letters sent by BOTH board of director's. When I say comply I mean with every line item. 

This means archiving the old HHBR Facebook page - people can still see it, all archiving does is close ability to post or comment etc. Many good things are on that page and should stay visible to the public. Blaze did found the rescue, but his term is over and that page needs to be PERMANENTLY archived.

His using rescue related gmail accounts, Paypal etc need to end. All usage of those things must cease and he should provide proof those accounts are closed / cancelled. 

A public post would be nice, but Blaze will not do it. I think he should post PUBLICALLY an apology to the new board and the public which also states he is backing off the new boards daily operations. 

If he does those 3 things, work on the rest of the cease and desist letters, then and only then can I believe he is sincere about backing down. He must also know that public post must be 100% truthful. He is to blame for this entire fucked up mess and he needs to own that.

So, if that post tries to lay blame off on anyone else it is not acceptable to prove he is backing off or that he has owned his part in everything.

I also want a public statement concerning Salvatore..... Blaze threatened to trespass on my property mainly to steal Salvatore, he doesn't give a rats ass about Issa he never did, not even when he lived on my property, so his public statement should be addressing the dog he is really after.

Blaze abandoned Salvatore TWICE in less than 4 months! First in October 2023 at Joshua Tree when he refused to go and handle that situation, then when he left my property and shoved Salvatore and Issa into a kennel that had zero shelter and could not be properly secured. 

Why does Blaze want him so badly? Salvatore is an AMAZING dog and he knows this. Salvatore is out on foster and still waiting for his forever home, but he is by far one of the most well behaved dogs I have ever worked with! So, Blaze knows this and this makes Salvatore desirable to him because he can flip Salvatore for a few hundreds bucks.

Also, a step in the right direction would be for Blaze to cough up the $350 adoption deposit he took on Issa so it can be refunded to the lady who returned Issa. Blaze wrongfully spent those funds on things NOT approved by California Code, which is why the new board was instructed by the nonprofit attorney to file a criminal embezzlement charge on Blaze. A step in proving he is backing off would be to reimburse the rescue for that adoption deposit so it can be refunded to her. It is NOT to be turned over to the lady awaiting the refund directly, no. By law it must be reimbursed to the rescue and the rescue must issue that refund. Since there IS a criminal investigation filed on this particular adoption deposit certain legal steps must be followed. The refund is not considered valid or legal if Blaze sends it to her because the rescue has no way to document that, nor would the sheriff and DA.

I will consider baby steps, but those steps must be as stated above. A public post is non-negotiable. it must happen and must be truthful. 

Now I have to go and enjoy the rest of my day and hopefully see some compliance on these matters. 

Have a blessed day folks!