Roe vs Wade - Britannica

 

https://www.britannica.com/event/Roe-v-Wade

 

Something I am finding strange as I read more in depth on this issue...... Why did people fight AGAINST having doctors that were on staff at the hospital? I mean, this was not just about a woman's right to abortion or privacy - it was about stopping back room, dirty table abortions right??? So why fight having good doctors performing the procedure????

 

Literally every article I have been reading details the fight AGAINST having an on staff doctor performing the procedure. There are also fights against states collecting data like how many abortions are performed, what ethnic groups, what location etc.... 

 

Since we KNOW minority women utilize these services the most..... It is like they do not want the general public to KNOW just how many babies they are killing.... YES babies!!!! The scientific term is fetus - but it IS a living human child. 

 

Any psychology major can tell you that by objectifying someone it is easier to HARM them. So, by refusing to refer to a pregnancy as a BABY or CHILD - instead - using the scientific term, it makes it easier to terminate a pregnancy - murder a living human.....

 

A direct quote from this article:

 

"Repeated challenges since 1973 narrowed the scope of Roe v. Wade but did not overturn it. In Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pennsylvania v. Casey (1992), the Supreme Court established that restrictions on abortion are unconstitutional if they place an “undue burden” on a woman seeking an abortion before the fetus is viable. In Gonzales v. Carhart (2007), the Court upheld the federal Partial-Birth Abortion Ban Act (2003), which prohibited a rarely used abortion procedure known as intact dilation and evacuation. In Whole Woman’s Health v. Hellerstedt (2016), the Court invoked its decision in Casey to strike down two provisions of a Texas law requiring abortion clinics to meet the standards of ambulatory surgical centres and abortion doctors to have admitting privileges at a nearby hospital. Four years later, in June Medical Services L.L.C. v. Russo (2020), the Court invoked Whole Woman’s Health to declare unconstitutional a Louisiana statute that was, as the majority noted, nearly identical to Texas’s admitting-privileges law."

 

 

 

This issue ONLY became an issue when people began pushing the boundaries.  Partial birth abortions, late term abortions, using abortion as the go to method of birth control and so forth CAUSED this to be overturned in reality. I will be posting other blog articles on the various methods of abortion - focusing mainly on the ones that caused this to be brought to the forefront.

But here is a point to ponder on..... Each of the conservative judges were asked a question.... "Would you overturn Roe vs Wade if you are appointed". So do tell WHY our government finds it so important to ask a nominee this question. Why does our government CARE if a woman chooses to terminate a pregnancy?????